Drew's Iceland Paper
In August, I traveled to Iceland for the international Youth Eco-Forum on climate change and renewable energy, where I learned about Iceland’s progressive system of energy production. I also learned a lot about the effects of global warming around the Arctic, especially in Alaska.
Throughout my Iceland trip, I was subjected to much good-natured ridicule for my country’s lack of leadership on global warming. One embarrassing point was my homeland’s thumbing its nose at Kyoto and any other emissions reduction idea. Upon my return, I investigated the matter and was pleased to find that Alaska’s neighbors, California and Oregon, have passed laws requiring reduced emissions; and most of New England has allied with its Canadian neighbors to the same end. Despite the apathy of our current national leaders, Americans have demonstrated a willingness to deal with this issue. Now it is Alaska’s turn. As the state most afflicted by the consequences of global warming, Alaska must set an example and take action now.
Global warming is not something that will go away soon; it will not, like smoking, begin getting better the moment we cease to pollute; carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for upward of 90 years; and the carbon dioxide there now will increase average global temperatures by more than 2 degrees Celsius. Billions of dollars in damages have been accrued, and billions more will pile up; from massive disasters like Katrina, and from less focused but no less destructive disasters like melting permafrost, flooding and erosion. As a youth, I care, because youth today will be coping with these issues throughout our lifetimes.
The world’s fossil fuel reserves are dwindling. The United States consumes twenty-five percent of the world’s oil, and as production peaks and declines, prices will rise exponentially. Gas prices are going up--Enstar, an Alaskan natural gas vendor, recently announced a twenty percent price hike. This will not be an isolated event. Our economy cannot bear the burden of continued consumption at this level; we must diversify or face economic pandemonium when oil production declines.
We have opportunities right here in our own backyard to combat global warming and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. We can support renewable power from projects like Chugach Electric’s Fire Island project. This project would place wind turbines three miles off the coast of Anchorage, producing approximately seven percent of Chugach Electric’s yearly electricity. Alaskans can show their support for this project by going to: www.chugachelectric.com/energy/altenergy/wp_business.html.
Electricity generation is the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation and residential use of energy are huge contributors. The transportation and residential sectors are areas that the American public has tremendous control over, and they combine for nearly forty percent of total U.S. emissions. We must choose to live smarter. By taking the city bus (see www.muni.org/transit1), or implementing LEED design standards for our new buildings in Alaska (see www.usgbc.org/LEED), we would not only reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases significantly, but we would save money and strengthen our state economy.
Global warming is now; the era of cheap oil dead. Whether you support renewable energy for the sake of posterity or as an economic alternative to increasing oil costs, renewable energy projects are a necessary part of the future. However, they are not a substitute for fossil fuel use—we have to take action to curb our energy consumption. Whether by turning out the lights or trading in your Hummer for a hybrid, anything that we do to reduce consumption will not only save money, but also reduce the destruction my generation has to contend with.
In 2003, Iceland consumed 7.8 billion Kilowatt-hours of energy; that same year, they generated 8.4 Billion Kilowatt-hours of electricity from renewable resources. If Iceland can do it, surely Alaska and America can, too

